AI Tool ScorecardJust launched

DecisionsApi — AI Classification, Scoring, and Routing API

DecisionsApi turns message context into typed AI decisions — categories, scores, and yes/no judgments — via one REST endpoint and a browser workbench.

FreemiumAI Developer Toolsdecisionapi.net
Visit
Published on Oct 4, 2026

Decision summary

DecisionsApi — AI Classification, Scoring, and Routing API

Best for

  • Developers building support-ticket triage and urgency scoring
  • Agent builders routing between tools or models on typed decisions
  • Teams adding LLM guardrails and evidence checks before answers ship

Watch out for

  • Probabilities are model signals, not accuracy guarantees — calibrate thresholds on your own labeled examples
  • Question-type support varies by model
  • Live requests require sign-in and consume credits; playground configurations are not saved

Overview

What is DecisionsApi?

DecisionsApi is a developer platform that turns unstructured inputs — customer messages, agent context, source evidence — into structured decisions an application can act on. Instead of parsing free-form LLM output, developers define named questions with allowed answers or scales, send one request with the shared context (called "state"), and receive typed answers with probability and confidence signals.

The platform is operated by DecisionsApi and describes itself as an independently operated site — it is explicitly not the official OpenAI site, and it is distinct from OpenAI's public-beta Decisions API that lives at /v1/decisions. The site is built on Cloudflare, and blog posts dated October 2026 suggest a recent launch. Intended use cases include support-ticket triage, urgency scoring, human-escalation checks, agent tool routing, evidence and grounding checks, lead scoring, moderation, and LLM guardrails.

How DecisionsApi Works

The workflow has four steps. First, supply context — the state that all questions in the request share. Second, define named questions with their allowed answers or scales; a request can carry 1 to 8 typed questions of three kinds: Choice (pick one category), Score (ordered priority levels), and Noul (a yes/no condition check). Requests are capped at 32 KiB. Third, inspect the response — typed answers with probabilities, confidence, and usage. Fourth, map the results to application logic: route a ticket, escalate to a human, or block a prompt.

Integration is a single REST endpoint, POST /v1/systemone, authenticated with a bearer token. A browser workbench mirrors the API for testing: it has an editable input, a library of 15 example scenarios (support triage, lead scoring, LLM guardrails, and more), and side-by-side model comparison — loading examples consumes no credits, while live requests require sign-in and consume credits.

Main Features

  • Three question types — Choice for categories, Score for ordered priority levels, and Noul for yes/no condition checks.
  • Multi-question requests — 1 to 8 typed questions per request, all sharing one state input, within a 32 KiB limit.
  • Model comparison — test the same labeled cases across models such as GPT-6 Luna, Jev 1.13, Laya, Clef, PPLX Decider, Liquid d1, Mercury, Solar, and Span-01.
  • Browser workbench — editable input and 15 ready-made scenarios for trying the decision format without code.
  • Typed REST API — POST /v1/systemone with bearer-token auth returning structured answers, probabilities, and usage.
  • Unified credit wallet — one balance covers playground, API, and evaluation calls.

Pricing

DecisionsApi uses one-time credit packs with no expiry and no auto-renewal. Starter costs $10 for 100,000 credits with one workspace and 3 concurrent requests at standard speed. Pro costs $100 for 1,000,000 credits (marked as recommended) with unlimited workspaces, 10 concurrent requests, and a fast lane. Enterprise costs $1,000 for 11,000,000 credits — a 10% bonus — with unlimited concurrency, a dedicated fast lane, team collaboration, and priority support. Testing credits are granted on account signup, so the platform has a free tier for evaluation. The site notes that platform credits are billed separately from direct OpenAI billing.

Common Use Cases

  • Support ticket triage — classifying incoming messages into categories and urgency scores.
  • Escalation checks — yes/no decisions on when a conversation needs a human.
  • Agent and tool routing — choosing which tool or model an agent should call next.
  • Lead scoring and moderation — ordered priority levels and condition checks over signups or content.
  • LLM guardrails — grounding and evidence checks before an answer is shown.

Limitations

The site is explicit that probabilities and confidence values are model signals, not accuracy guarantees — thresholds must be calibrated against your own labeled examples, which is real work before production. Question-type support varies by model, and model names and provider availability belong to their respective developers. Live requests require sign-in and consume credits, and configurations and run history are not saved from playground examples. The name invites confusion with OpenAI's separate public-beta Decisions API; this platform uses its own endpoint, model IDs, and schema. No company entity, country, or launch year is published.

Summary

DecisionsApi packages a narrow but useful idea: ask AI models typed questions over shared context and get structured, probability-bearing answers back through one endpoint. The workbench with 15 scenarios makes the format easy to evaluate, and the one-time credit packs with no expiry keep costs predictable for intermittent use. The trade-offs are the calibration burden on the developer, per-model differences in what is supported, and the naming overlap with OpenAI's separate Decisions API. It fits developers who need dependable triage, routing, or guardrail decisions inside an application and are prepared to validate thresholds on their own data.

Reviews (0)

—0 ratings

No reviews yet. Be the first to rate this product!

Score anatomy

The dimensions behind the editorial score, each with its judgment note. AI Readiness and GEO Score are platform assessments generated by AIGCLIST after submission.

Information quality

The site documents its three question types, 32 KiB request limit, REST endpoint with bearer-token auth, credit pricing, and non-affiliation disclaimers in concrete terms, including explicit advice to calibrate thresholds on labeled examples.

7.6
Contextual

Official homepage, checked October 2026.

Ease of use

A browser workbench with editable input and 15 example scenarios (support triage, lead scoring, LLM guardrails) lets developers try the decision format without writing code; loading examples consumes no credits.

7.4
Contextual

Official homepage workbench description.

Feature depth

The feature set covers Choice, Score, and yes/no question types, 1-8 typed questions per request sharing one state input, multi-question batch requests, and side-by-side comparison of models such as GPT-6 Luna, Jev 1.13, Laya, and Mercury.

7.0
Contextual

Official homepage feature and model-comparison sections.

Workflow fit

Typed decision output with probability and confidence signals maps directly onto routing, escalation, and guardrail logic; one credit wallet spans playground, API, and evaluation calls.

7.4
Contextual

Official homepage integration and workflow sections.

Reliability

The site itself cautions that probabilities and confidence are model signals, not accuracy guarantees, and that thresholds must be calibrated on your own labeled examples; question-type support also varies by model.

6.6
Verify

Official homepage caveats section.

Value

One-time packs run $10 for 100,000 credits, $100 for 1,000,000, and $1,000 for 11,000,000 with no expiry and no auto-renewal, plus testing credits on signup — predictable costs for intermittent production use.

7.6
Contextual

Official homepage pricing section.

Scores indicate documented product strength, not a hands-on guarantee.

Evidence check

Public claims about this tool, each tagged with a verification status and its cited source.

One-time credit packs from $103
DecisionsApiVerifiedChecked Oct 14, 2026

DecisionsApi sells one-time packs with no expiry and no auto-renewal: Starter at $10 for 100,000 credits (1 workspace, 3 concurrent requests), Pro at $100 for 1,000,000 credits (unlimited workspaces, 10 concurrent, fast lane), and Enterprise at $1,000 for 11,000,000 credits (10% bonus, unlimited concurrency, priority support); testing credits are granted at signup and one wallet spans playground, API, and evaluation calls.

The platform exposes Choice (category pick), Score (ordered priority levels), and Noul (yes/no condition) question types — 1 to 8 typed questions per request sharing one state input, requests up to 32 KiB — via POST /v1/systemone with bearer-token auth, returning typed answers with probability and confidence signals; a workbench offers 15 example scenarios and model comparison across GPT-6 Luna, Jev 1.13, Laya, Clef, PPLX Decider, Liquid d1, Mercury, Solar, and Span-01.

The site states that probabilities and confidence are model signals rather than accuracy guarantees that must be calibrated on your own labeled examples, that live requests require sign-in and consume credits, and that it is an independently operated platform distinct from OpenAI's public-beta Decisions API at /v1/decisions.

https://decisionapi.net/
DecisionsApi official website

Product scope, question types, API shape, model comparison, pricing, and limitations verified against the official homepage, October 2026. · Oct 14, 2026

Decision desk

The questions most worth resolving before you rely on the product or visit its official site.

It turns inputs such as customer messages or agent context into structured AI decisions — a chosen category, an ordered score, or a yes/no judgment — each returned with probability and confidence signals through one REST endpoint.

One-time packs with no expiry: Starter $10 for 100,000 credits, Pro $100 for 1,000,000 credits, and Enterprise $1,000 for 11,000,000 credits. Testing credits are granted on signup, and one wallet covers workbench, API, and evaluation calls.

No. The site states it is an independently operated platform and is distinct from OpenAI's public-beta Decisions API at /v1/decisions, which uses a different endpoint, model IDs, and schema.

Testing credits are granted at account signup, and loading workbench examples consumes no credits. Live requests require sign-in and consume credits from the shared wallet.

The workbench's comparison covers models listed on the site, including GPT-6 Luna, Jev 1.13, Laya, Clef, PPLX Decider, Liquid d1, Mercury, Solar, and Span-01; question-type support varies by model.

Verify on official site

Continue exploring

More in AI Developer Tools

Published tools that share this product's primary category. They are discovery links, not editorial comparisons.