AIGCLISTAIGCLIST
CodingPlan
AI Tool Scorecard

CodingPlan

A reseller marketplace for AI coding subscriptions offering tiered MiniMax and GLM plans with disclosed request quotas, TPS throughput targets, OpenClaw agent support, smart model routing, and highspeed variants across Professional, Advanced, Lite, and Pro tiers.

FreemiumAI Code Assistantcodingplan.io
Visit
Published on Jul 6, 2026

Benchmarks

How CodingPlan scores on agent readiness and AI visibility AI Readiness and GEO Score are platform assessments generated by VibeLaunch after submission.

Powered by AIGC List Benchmarks

Decision summary

Professional and advanced developers managing complex to high-volume coding workloads who benefit from transparent plan specifications and multi-agent support.

Selecting a tiered AI coding plan matched to specific workload requirements—request volume, throughput needs, agent count, and model routing preferences—through a reseller with disclosed quota specifications.

Best for

  • Developers who need transparent quota and throughput specs before purchasing
  • Teams using OpenClaw agents for multi-agent coding workflows
  • Users who want highspeed model variants for latency-sensitive development

Watch out for

  • Performance comparison claims—3× faster and 3× Claude Pro—are unverified vendor assertions
  • 5-hour request windows with limited daily replenishment may constrain continuous high-volume workflows
  • Third-party reseller model introduces counterparty risk absent from official provider subscriptions

Overview

Plan Overview

CodingPlan offers resold AI coding subscriptions with detailed plan specifications across two provider families: MiniMax and GLM. Each plan specifies concrete request quotas, model assignments, throughput characteristics, and agent-support limits—providing materially more transparency than top-level discount messaging alone.

MiniMax Plans

The MiniMax family includes Professional and Advanced tiers, each available in standard and highspeed configurations.

The Professional tier allocates 4,500 model requests per 5-hour window, powered by MiniMax-M2.7 at approximately 50 tokens per second under normal conditions and 100 TPS during off-peak periods. It supports 1–2 OpenClaw agents, includes image understanding, and represents three times the Starter plan usage. The Advanced tier scales to 15,000 model requests per 5-hour window—ten times the Starter plan baseline—and supports 2–3 OpenClaw agents for high-volume development workflows.

A highspeed variant of both tiers runs on MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed, delivering approximately 100 TPS sustained throughput. CodingPlan claims this is up to three times faster than competing models, though no benchmarking methodology or comparator list is disclosed. Users can also switch to MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed as an alternative model. All MiniMax plans are described as compatible with major coding tools and include access to image understanding capabilities.

GLM Plans

The GLM family offers Lite and Pro tiers. The Lite tier provides 80 prompt calls per 5-hour window—claimed by CodingPlan to represent three times the usage of a Claude Pro subscription—and employs smart model routing by scenario. Simple coding tasks default to GLM-4.5-Air for cost efficiency, while GLM-5 access is gradually rolling out. The Pro tier scales to 400 prompt calls per 5-hour window, five times the Lite tier, and includes full GLM-5 access. Complex coding tasks are routed to GLM-4.6 or GLM-5 depending on the scenario.

Operational Constraints

Both GLM tiers are subject to limited daily replenishment at 10:00. The 3× Claude Pro usage comparison and 3× faster-than-competitors claim are vendor assertions without independent verification.

Alternatives

Developers evaluating CodingPlan may also consider Claude Buddy, APIDot, or OpenClaw AI—each operates in the space with different pricing, integration, and feature models.

Reviews (0)

—0 ratings

No reviews yet. Be the first to rate this product!

Score anatomy

The dimensions behind the editorial score, each with its judgment note. AI Readiness and GEO Score are platform assessments generated by VibeLaunch after submission.

Information quality

Plan specifications include concrete, decision-useful data—request quotas, TPS figures, model assignments, agent limits, and replenishment schedules. However, competitive performance claims remain unverified vendor assertions without methodology disclosure.

5.5
Verify

Request quotas and TPS figures are explicitly stated across six plan variants (p0068, p0074, p0080, p0087, p0095, p0102). The 3× faster claim (p0080, p0087) and 3× Claude Pro claim (p0095) lack methodology or comparator disclosure.

Ease of use

Tiered plans with explicit quotas make plan selection more straightforward than a generic discount pitch. However, the purchase flow, account provisioning mechanism, and onboarding experience remain undocumented.

5.0
Verify

Plan tiers are clearly differentiated by quota size, agent count, and model assignment (p0068, p0074, p0080, p0087, p0095, p0102), but no purchase-flow documentation or UX details exist in the source packet.

Feature depth

The source material now describes distinct features across plan families—highspeed variants, smart model routing, OpenClaw agent support, image understanding, and model-selection flexibility. This is a significant improvement over earlier marketing-only snapshots.

5.5
Verify

Highspeed configurations (p0080, p0087), smart routing logic (p0095, p0102), agent support limits (p0068, p0074), and image understanding (p0068, p0074) are all specified with concrete parameters.

Workflow fit

Explicit OpenClaw agent support, multi-tool compatibility claims, and tiered quotas help developers match plans to workloads. However, no IDE-specific integration details, API documentation, or authentication flows are described.

5.0
Verify

OpenClaw agent support is quantified per tier (p0068, p0074, p0080, p0087). Compatibility with all major coding tools is claimed (p0068, p0074) but not enumerated. Smart routing (p0095, p0102) supports workflow optimization.

Reliability

5-hour quota windows with limited daily replenishment caps introduce usage constraints. The reseller model means plan continuity depends on upstream provider relationships. No uptime SLA, support policy, or provider-agreement transparency is offered.

3.5
Verify

Daily replenishment at 10:00 with limited capacity (p0095, p0102) and 5-hour window structure (p0068, p0074, p0080, p0087) are stated constraints. No contractual or SLA documentation exists in the source packet.

Value

Plan quotas and throughput specs are now transparent enough for workload-based comparison, but the complete absence of pricing data prevents any value assessment. Users can evaluate whether quotas fit their needs but cannot evaluate cost relative to official subscriptions.

4.0
Verify

Request quotas and TPS figures are specified (p0068, p0074, p0080, p0087, p0095, p0102), enabling workload-fit evaluation. No pricing information exists in the source packet for cost comparison.

Scores indicate documented product strength, not a hands-on guarantee.

Agent Readiness

How well an agent can understand this product and reconstruct a documented workflow from its official information.

Automated agent-readiness assessment of https://codingplan.io/: 3 of 22 checks verified across 1 fetched pages. No substantial machine interface is documented — agents can understand and cite the product but not operate it. Absent: docs, agent_tooling_artifacts, quickstart, api_reference, authentication, request_examples.

Readiness dimensions

DimensionScore
Documentation quality0
Execution verifiability0
Machine interface10
Project clarity75
Resource discoverability55
Workflow completeness0

What helps agents

  • llms txt: verified during this run
  • sitemap: verified during this run
  • mcp: verified during this run

Where agents are blocked

  • No documentation or developer pages discovered from the entry page or well-known paths.
  • No agent instruction files, code-distribution commands, or named slash-command skills found across fetched pages.
  • No quickstart signal matched across 1 fetched pages.
  • No authentication signal matched across 1 fetched pages.
  • No request examples signal matched across 1 fetched pages.
  • No response examples signal matched across 1 fetched pages.

Evidence check

Public claims about this tool, each tagged with a verification status and its cited source.

codingplan.io9
codingplan.ioVerifiedChecked Aug 30, 2026

The MiniMax Professional plan provides 4,500 model requests per 5-hour window, powered by MiniMax-M2.7 at ~50 TPS normally (100 TPS off-peak), supporting 1–2 OpenClaw agents and representing 3× the Starter plan usage.

The MiniMax Advanced plan provides 15,000 model requests per 5-hour window (10× the Starter plan), powered by MiniMax-M2.7 at ~50 TPS normally (100 TPS off-peak), supporting 2–3 OpenClaw agents for high-volume development workloads.

Highspeed MiniMax variants run on MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed at ~100 TPS sustained throughput, and support model selection between MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed and MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed.

CodingPlan claims the highspeed MiniMax variant is up to 3× faster than competing models.

The GLM Lite plan provides 80 prompt calls per 5-hour window with smart model routing that directs simple tasks to GLM-4.5-Air, with GLM-5 gradually rolling out and limited daily replenishment at 10:00.

The GLM Pro plan provides 400 prompt calls per 5-hour window (5× the Lite tier), includes the GLM-5 model, and routes complex coding tasks to GLM-4.6 or GLM-5 via smart routing, with limited daily replenishment at 10:00.

CodingPlan claims the GLM Lite plan offers 3× the usage of a Claude Pro subscription.

All MiniMax plan tiers include image understanding capabilities and are described as compatible with all major coding tools.

The entry page was fetched and analyzed for machine-interface signals (title, headings, developer links, keyword probes).

https://codingplan.io/
https://codingplan.io/llms.txt1
codingplan.ioVerifiedChecked Aug 30, 2026

llms.txt is published at the site root and readable.

https://codingplan.io/llms.txt
https://codingplan.io/sitemap.xml1
codingplan.ioVerifiedChecked Aug 30, 2026

sitemap.xml is reachable and lists site pages.

https://codingplan.io/sitemap.xml

Decision desk

The questions most worth resolving before you rely on the product or visit its official site.

The platform offers MiniMax Professional (4,500 requests/5hr) and Advanced (15,000 requests/5hr) tiers in standard and highspeed configurations, plus GLM Lite (80 prompt calls/5hr) and Pro (400 prompt calls/5hr) tiers with smart model routing.

The highspeed configuration delivers approximately 100 TPS sustained throughput via MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed. CodingPlan claims this is up to three times faster than competing models—a vendor assertion without independent benchmarking.

Simple coding tasks are routed to GLM-4.5-Air for efficiency, while complex tasks use GLM-4.6 or GLM-5 depending on the scenario. This avoids running every request through heavyweight models.

Professional-tier plans support 1–2 OpenClaw agents; Advanced-tier plans support 2–3 agents. These are explicit ceilings stated in the plan specifications.

GLM plans have limited daily replenishment at 10:00. MiniMax plan replenishment timing is not specified in the available source material.

Verify on official site

Continue exploring

Different paths for a similar job

These tools were linked as editorial alternatives with a documented reason for the relationship.

01Claude Buddy

Claude Buddy

Operates in the AI code assistant space with direct provider integration rather than a third-party reseller model with quota windows.

View record
02APIDot

APIDot

Offers an alternative approach to AI-assisted coding with distinct pricing, integration, and feature models outside the reseller framework.

View record
03OpenClaw AI

OpenClaw AI

Competes in the AI code assistant category with a different product architecture; CodingPlan's plans explicitly reference OpenClaw agent support as a compatibility feature.

View record
View all CodingPlan alternatives