AIGCLISTAIGCLIST
CodingPlan
AI 工具评分卡

CodingPlan

用于AI编码订阅的转售市场，提供分层的MiniMax和GLM计划，包括明确的请求配额、TPS吞吐量目标、OpenClaw代理支持、智能模型路由以及跨Professional、Advanced、Lite和Pro级别的高速变体。

免费增值AI 代码助手codingplan.io
访问
发布于 2026年7月6日

基准评分

CodingPlan 在 Agent 就绪度与 AI 可见性上的得分 AI 就绪度和 GEO Score 是 VibeLaunch 在提交后生成的平台评估。

由 AIGC List 基准评分提供支持

决策摘要

Professional and advanced developers managing complex to high-volume coding workloads who benefit from transparent plan specifications and multi-agent support.

Selecting a tiered AI coding plan matched to specific workload requirements—request volume, throughput needs, agent count, and model routing preferences—through a reseller with disclosed quota specifications.

适合

  • Developers who need transparent quota and throughput specs before purchasing
  • Teams using OpenClaw agents for multi-agent coding workflows
  • Users who want highspeed model variants for latency-sensitive development

注意

  • Performance comparison claims—3× faster and 3× Claude Pro—are unverified vendor assertions
  • 5-hour request windows with limited daily replenishment may constrain continuous high-volume workflows
  • Third-party reseller model introduces counterparty risk absent from official provider subscriptions

概述

计划概述

CodingPlan提供转售的AI编码订阅，涵盖两个提供商家族的详细计划规格：MiniMax和GLM。每个计划都明确了具体的请求配额、模型分配、吞吐量特性和代理支持限制——相比仅提供顶级折扣信息，提供了实质性的透明度。

MiniMax计划

MiniMax家族包括Professional和Advanced级别，每个级别均提供标准配置和高速配置。

Professional级别在每5小时窗口内分配4500次模型请求，由MiniMax-M2.7驱动，正常条件下约50 tokens/秒，非高峰时段可达100 TPS。支持1-2个OpenClaw代理，包含图像理解，使用量是Starter计划的3倍。Advanced级别将请求量扩展至每5小时窗口15000次——是Starter计划基准的10倍——并支持2-3个OpenClaw代理，适用于高容量开发工作流。

两个级别的高速变体运行于MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed，提供约100 TPS的持续吞吐量。CodingPlan声称其速度是竞争模型的3倍，但未披露基准测试方法或比较对象。用户也可以切换到MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed作为替代模型。所有MiniMax计划均描述为与主流编码工具兼容，并包含图像理解功能。

GLM计划

GLM家族提供Lite和Pro级别。Lite级别每5小时窗口提供80次提示调用——CodingPlan声称相当于Claude Pro订阅使用量的3倍——并根据场景采用智能模型路由。简单的编码任务默认使用GLM-4.5-Air以节省成本，而GLM-5正在逐步推出。Pro级别将请求量扩展至每5小时窗口400次，是Lite级别的5倍，并包含完整的GLM-5访问权限。复杂的编码任务根据场景路由至GLM-4.6或GLM-5。

操作限制

两个GLM级别均受限于每天10:00的有限度补充。3倍Claude Pro使用量对比和3倍比竞争对手快的声明是供应商的断言，未经独立验证。

替代方案

评估CodingPlan的开发者也可以考虑Claude Buddy、APIDot或OpenClaw AI——每个都在该领域以不同的定价、集成和功能模式运营。

评价 (0)

—0 条评分

还没有评价。成为第一个评价的人！

评分构成

编辑评分由哪些维度构成，每项附判断依据。 AI 就绪度和 GEO Score 是 VibeLaunch 在提交后生成的平台评估。

Information quality

Plan specifications include concrete, decision-useful data—request quotas, TPS figures, model assignments, agent limits, and replenishment schedules. However, competitive performance claims remain unverified vendor assertions without methodology disclosure.

5.5
建议核验

Request quotas and TPS figures are explicitly stated across six plan variants (p0068, p0074, p0080, p0087, p0095, p0102). The 3× faster claim (p0080, p0087) and 3× Claude Pro claim (p0095) lack methodology or comparator disclosure.

Ease of use

Tiered plans with explicit quotas make plan selection more straightforward than a generic discount pitch. However, the purchase flow, account provisioning mechanism, and onboarding experience remain undocumented.

5.0
建议核验

Plan tiers are clearly differentiated by quota size, agent count, and model assignment (p0068, p0074, p0080, p0087, p0095, p0102), but no purchase-flow documentation or UX details exist in the source packet.

Feature depth

The source material now describes distinct features across plan families—highspeed variants, smart model routing, OpenClaw agent support, image understanding, and model-selection flexibility. This is a significant improvement over earlier marketing-only snapshots.

5.5
建议核验

Highspeed configurations (p0080, p0087), smart routing logic (p0095, p0102), agent support limits (p0068, p0074), and image understanding (p0068, p0074) are all specified with concrete parameters.

Workflow fit

Explicit OpenClaw agent support, multi-tool compatibility claims, and tiered quotas help developers match plans to workloads. However, no IDE-specific integration details, API documentation, or authentication flows are described.

5.0
建议核验

OpenClaw agent support is quantified per tier (p0068, p0074, p0080, p0087). Compatibility with all major coding tools is claimed (p0068, p0074) but not enumerated. Smart routing (p0095, p0102) supports workflow optimization.

Reliability

5-hour quota windows with limited daily replenishment caps introduce usage constraints. The reseller model means plan continuity depends on upstream provider relationships. No uptime SLA, support policy, or provider-agreement transparency is offered.

3.5
建议核验

Daily replenishment at 10:00 with limited capacity (p0095, p0102) and 5-hour window structure (p0068, p0074, p0080, p0087) are stated constraints. No contractual or SLA documentation exists in the source packet.

Value

Plan quotas and throughput specs are now transparent enough for workload-based comparison, but the complete absence of pricing data prevents any value assessment. Users can evaluate whether quotas fit their needs but cannot evaluate cost relative to official subscriptions.

4.0
建议核验

Request quotas and TPS figures are specified (p0068, p0074, p0080, p0087, p0095, p0102), enabling workload-fit evaluation. No pricing information exists in the source packet for cost comparison.

评分反映可查证的产品资料，不代表实际使用效果保证。

Agent 就绪度

评估 Agent 能否通过产品的官方信息理解产品，并重建一条有文档依据的工作流程。

Automated agent-readiness assessment of https://codingplan.io/: 3 of 22 checks verified across 1 fetched pages. No substantial machine interface is documented — agents can understand and cite the product but not operate it. Absent: docs, agent_tooling_artifacts, quickstart, api_reference, authentication, request_examples.

就绪度维度

评估维度得分
文档质量0
执行结果可验证性0
机器接口10
项目定位清晰度75
资源可发现性55
工作流完整度0

对 Agent 有帮助的部分

  • llms txt: verified during this run
  • sitemap: verified during this run
  • mcp: verified during this run

Agent 受阻的部分

  • No documentation or developer pages discovered from the entry page or well-known paths.
  • No agent instruction files, code-distribution commands, or named slash-command skills found across fetched pages.
  • No quickstart signal matched across 1 fetched pages.
  • No authentication signal matched across 1 fetched pages.
  • No request examples signal matched across 1 fetched pages.
  • No response examples signal matched across 1 fetched pages.

证据核查

关于该工具的公开声明，每条均标注核验状态与引用来源。

codingplan.io9
codingplan.io已验证核验于 2026年8月30日

The MiniMax Professional plan provides 4,500 model requests per 5-hour window, powered by MiniMax-M2.7 at ~50 TPS normally (100 TPS off-peak), supporting 1–2 OpenClaw agents and representing 3× the Starter plan usage.

The MiniMax Advanced plan provides 15,000 model requests per 5-hour window (10× the Starter plan), powered by MiniMax-M2.7 at ~50 TPS normally (100 TPS off-peak), supporting 2–3 OpenClaw agents for high-volume development workloads.

Highspeed MiniMax variants run on MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed at ~100 TPS sustained throughput, and support model selection between MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed and MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed.

CodingPlan claims the highspeed MiniMax variant is up to 3× faster than competing models.

The GLM Lite plan provides 80 prompt calls per 5-hour window with smart model routing that directs simple tasks to GLM-4.5-Air, with GLM-5 gradually rolling out and limited daily replenishment at 10:00.

The GLM Pro plan provides 400 prompt calls per 5-hour window (5× the Lite tier), includes the GLM-5 model, and routes complex coding tasks to GLM-4.6 or GLM-5 via smart routing, with limited daily replenishment at 10:00.

CodingPlan claims the GLM Lite plan offers 3× the usage of a Claude Pro subscription.

All MiniMax plan tiers include image understanding capabilities and are described as compatible with all major coding tools.

The entry page was fetched and analyzed for machine-interface signals (title, headings, developer links, keyword probes).

https://codingplan.io/
https://codingplan.io/llms.txt1
codingplan.io已验证核验于 2026年8月30日

llms.txt is published at the site root and readable.

https://codingplan.io/llms.txt
https://codingplan.io/sitemap.xml1
codingplan.io已验证核验于 2026年8月30日

sitemap.xml is reachable and lists site pages.

https://codingplan.io/sitemap.xml

决策核对台

在依赖该产品或访问官网前，最值得先确认的问题。

The platform offers MiniMax Professional (4,500 requests/5hr) and Advanced (15,000 requests/5hr) tiers in standard and highspeed configurations, plus GLM Lite (80 prompt calls/5hr) and Pro (400 prompt calls/5hr) tiers with smart model routing.

The highspeed configuration delivers approximately 100 TPS sustained throughput via MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed. CodingPlan claims this is up to three times faster than competing models—a vendor assertion without independent benchmarking.

Simple coding tasks are routed to GLM-4.5-Air for efficiency, while complex tasks use GLM-4.6 or GLM-5 depending on the scenario. This avoids running every request through heavyweight models.

Professional-tier plans support 1–2 OpenClaw agents; Advanced-tier plans support 2–3 agents. These are explicit ceilings stated in the plan specifications.

GLM plans have limited daily replenishment at 10:00. MiniMax plan replenishment timing is not specified in the available source material.

请在官网核验

继续探索

相近任务的不同路径

这些工具以带有明确编辑理由的替代关系关联到当前产品。

01Claude Buddy

Claude Buddy

Operates in the AI code assistant space with direct provider integration rather than a third-party reseller model with quota windows.

查看档案
02APIDot

APIDot

Offers an alternative approach to AI-assisted coding with distinct pricing, integration, and feature models outside the reseller framework.

查看档案
03OpenClaw AI

OpenClaw AI

Competes in the AI code assistant category with a different product architecture; CodingPlan's plans explicitly reference OpenClaw agent support as a compatibility feature.

查看档案
查看 CodingPlan 的全部替代工具